Personal tools
You are here: Home Publications Model financial statements Government departments Model Financial Statements (Extracts) - Ministry of Public Accountability 2010-11

Model Financial Statements (Extracts) - Ministry of Public Accountability 2010-11

About the updated model financial statements

The objective of the updated model financial statements (extracts) is to provide example financial statement disclosures for:

  • standards issued and not yet effective that have not been early adopted, a disclosure requirement of paragraph 30 of NZ IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors; and
  • the early adoption of NZ IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures for related party transactions.

We have not reproduced an entire set of the model financial statements. We have limited the update to the two key disclosure changes that apply to a government department’s 2010-11 financial statements.

Notes to the Financial Statements (Extracts)

NZ IAS 1.10(e) 1 Statement of accounting policies for the year ended 30 June 2011
  Early adoption of the revised NZ IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures
NZ IAS 24.28 The Ministry has early adopted NZ IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (Revised 2009). The effect of early adopting the revised NZ IAS 24 is:
  • more information is required to be disclosed about transactions between the Ministry and entities controlled, jointly controlled, or significantly influenced by the Crown;
  • commitments with related parties require disclosure; and
  • information is required to be disclosed about any related party transactions with Ministers of the Crown with portfolio responsibility for the Ministry. An exemption is provided from reporting transactions with other Ministers of the Crown.
NZ IAS 8.30,31 Standards, amendments, and interpretations issued that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted1

Standards, amendments, and interpretations issued but not yet effective that have not been early adopted, and which are relevant to the Ministry, are:
 
  • NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments will eventually replace NZ IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. NZ IAS 39 is being replaced through the following three main phases: Phase 1 Classification and Measurement, Phase 2 Impairment Methodology, and Phase 3 Hedge Accounting. Phase 1 has been completed and has been published in the new financial instrument standard NZ IFRS 9. NZ IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value, replacing the many different rules in NZ IAS 39. The approach in NZ IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial assets (its business model) and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The financial liability requirements are the same as those of NZ IAS 39, except for when an entity elects to designate a financial liability at fair value through the surplus or deficit. The new standard is required to be adopted for the year ended 30 June 2014. The Ministry has not yet assessed the effect of the new standard and expects it will not be early adopted.
  • FRS-44 New Zealand Additional Disclosures and Amendments to NZ IFRS to harmonise with IFRS and Australian Accounting Standards (Harmonisation Amendments) ­– These were issued in May 2011 with the purpose of harmonising Australia and New Zealand’s accounting standards with source IFRS and to eliminate many of the differences between the accounting standards in each jurisdiction. The amendments must first be adopted for the year ended 30 June 2012. The Ministry has not yet assessed the effects of FRS-44 and the Harmonisation Amendments.
  As the External Reporting Board is to decide on a new accounting standards framework for public benefit entities, it is expected that all new NZ IFRS and amendments to existing NZ IFRS with a mandatory effective date for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2012 will not be applicable to public benefit entities. This means that the financial reporting requirements for public benefit entities are expected to be effectively frozen in the short term. Accordingly, no disclosure has been made about new or amended NZ IFRS that exclude public benefit entities from their scope.
   
  21 Related party transactions
  All related party transactions have been entered into on an arms’ length basis.2
NZ IAS 24.26(a) The Ministry is a wholly-owned entity of the Crown. The Government significantly influences the roles of the Ministry as well as being its major source of revenue.
NZ IAS 24.26(b)(i) Significant transactions with government-related entities3
  The Ministry has received funding from the Crown of $230m (2010 $220m) to provide services to the public for the year ended 30 June 2011.
   
NZ IAS 24.26(b)(ii) Collectively, but not individually, significant transactions with government-related entities4

In conducting its activities, the Ministry is required to pay various taxes and levies (such as GST, FBT, PAYE, and ACC levies) to the Crown and entities related to the Crown. The payment of these taxes and levies, other than income tax, is based on the standard terms and conditions that apply to all tax and levy payers. The Ministry is exempt from paying income tax.

The Ministry also purchases goods and services from entities controlled, significantly influenced, or jointly controlled by the Crown. Purchases from these government-related entities for the year ended 30 June 2011 totalled $2.31m (2010 $2.21m). These purchases included the purchase of electricity from Genesis, air travel from Air New Zealand, legal services from Crown Law Office, and postal services from New Zealand Post.
   
  Transactions with key management personnel
NZ IAS 24.17 Key management personnel compensation
  Actual
2010
$000
  Actual
2011
$000
NZ IAS 24.17(a) 855 Salaries and other short-term employee benefits 896
NZ IAS 24.17(b) 25 Post-employment benefits 28
NZ IAS 24.17(c) 20 Other long-term benefits 32
NZ IAS 24.17(d) 0 Termination benefits 64
NZ IAS 24.17 900 Total key management personnel compensation 1,020
   
Good practice Key management personnel compensation includes the compensation of the Chief Executive and the five members of the Senior Management Team.5,6
  Key management personnel compensation excludes the remuneration and other benefits the Minister of Public Accountability receives. The Minister’s remuneration and other benefits are not received only for his role as a member of key management personnel of the Ministry. The Minister’s remuneration and other benefits are set by the Remuneration Authority under the Civil List Act 1979 and are paid under Permanent Legislative Authority, and not paid by the Ministry of Public Accountability.
NZ IAS 24.18(a),(b) Related party transactions involving key management personnel (or their close family members)
 
  • There are close family members of key management personnel employed by the Ministry.  The terms and conditions of those arrangements are no more favourable than the Ministry would have adopted if there were no relationship to key management personnel.
  • The Ministry purchased legal services from Expert Legal Advisers, a legal firm of which the Chief Executive’s husband is a partner. These services cost $34,760 (2010 $65,987) and were supplied on normal commercial terms. There is a balance of $2,376 (2010 $nil) outstanding at year end.
  • The Ministry contracted with Charity Organisation, of which the Corporate Services General Manager’s daughter is the sole Director. The value of the services provided under the contract during the year totalled $134,900 (2010 $45,870) and were negotiated on normal commercial terms. There were no outstanding balances at year end (2010 $2,400).
  • The Ministry contracted with Building Consultancy Limited, a company of which the Minister of Public Accountability’s son is the sole shareholder. The value of the contract works totalled $256,000 (2010 $nil). There were no amounts outstanding at year end (2010 $nil).
NZ IAS 24.18(c),(d) No provision has been required, nor any expense recognised, for impairment of receivables from related parties.

1: Although not a requirement of NZ IAS 8, it is good practice to disclose those standards, amendments, and interpretations that are not yet effective and which have been adopted early. The transitional provisions of a new standard, amendment, or interpretation may require disclosure if early adopted.

2: Disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions are made only if such terms can be substantiated (NZ IAS 24.23).

3 The nature and amount of each individually significant transaction with a government-related entity shall be separately disclosed (NZ IAS 24.26(b)(i)). The significance of a transaction is assessed both on its size and nature.

4: A qualitative or quantitative indication of the extent of collectively, but not individually, significant, transactions with government-related entities shall be disclosed (NZ IAS 24.26(b)(ii)).

5: The disclosure of the composition of key management personnel provides useful information to readers as to who are key management personnel.

6: NZ IAS 24 defines key management personnel as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of that entity. For a government department, we would expect the compensation of the Chief Executive and members of the senior management team, or equivalent body, to be included in the key management personnel compensation disclosures. There may also be other individuals who meet the key management personnel definition of NZ IAS 24. Government departments will need to consider their specific circumstances in determining the individuals that should be included in the key management personnel compensation disclosures.

page top
Print-friendly version
PDF icon

PDF, 90kB, 6 pages